Hi, I'm Chris Capre, founder of 2ndSkiesForex. I'm a verified profitable trader and trading mentor. As a professional trader, I specialize in trading Price Action and the Ichimoku cloud. As a trading mentor, I have one goal: to change the way you think, trade and perform using 18 years of trading experience and cutting edge neuroscience to wire your brain for successful trading. Want to improve your trading edge and mindset? Check out my trading courses here.
Engulfing Bars – The Truth No One is Telling You
Engulfing Bars – The truth no one is telling you
Have you ever tried to trade engulfing bars? Maybe you are currently doing so?
How has that been working out for you so far? A guess would be not so good.
There is a reason why your engulfing candle trading strategy isn’t working.
A simple but powerful truth the so-called price action authorities out there won’t tell you. A truth that reveals trading engulfing bars or any other one- or two-bar reversal pattern for that matter, not only puts you at a great disadvantage in the market, but it also has a very negative impact on your trading performance.
Now you must be asking yourself, if trading engulfing bars is a sub-optimal way of trading, why do so many price action sites and teachers market this way of trading as much as they do?
The reason behind that is very simple. The whole concept of trading simple 1- or 2-bar candlestick patterns from key support and resistance levels is very easy to understand, teach and learn. Thus, it is also very easy to market and sell to any new retail trader entering the trading arena.
Most retail traders come to the markets with unrealistic expectations and are therefore extra vulnerable to the “quick fix” trading approach these patterns offer. “Trade X, Y and Z patterns at A, B and C spots in the market and you’ll be making a lot of profit in no time.”
Other reasons this concept is so attractive for beginning retail traders is:
- a) It gives the trader a clear “signal” (reason) to enter the market which means less headache/work for the trader.
- b) It gives the trader a false sense of “confirmation”. A way of “confirming” the validity of a level creating the illusion of certainty.
This is of course a myth which we’ve discussed in earlier articles such as this one.
Keep in mind, quick and easy processes rarely lead to high quality results. More often than not, the output equals the input.
Before we go deeper into why trading engulfing bars puts you at a disadvantage in the markets, we have to give a very simple definition of the engulfing bar pattern.
For a bearish example of an engulfing bar pattern:
The A bar is a bullish bar (bar that closed up) and the B bar is a bearish bar (bar that closed down), whereby the high of the B bar is above the high of the A bar, but the close of the B bar is below the low of the A bar. If the low of the B bar is below the low of the A bar, but closes inside the price action of the A bar, then it is an outside bar pattern which is a different reversal pattern.
For a bullish example of an engulfing bar pattern:
The A bar is a bear bar, and the B bar is a bull bar, whereby the low of the B bar is below the low of the A bar, and the close of the B bar is above the high of the A bar. If the high of the B bar is above the A bar, yet the B bar closes inside the price action of the A bar, then it would be a bullish outside bar pattern.
Below are two visual examples of Bearish and Bullish Engulfing Bars:
Now that we’ve established what an engulfing bar is, let’s take a look at why using engulfing bars as a “signal” and/or “confirmation”, is a sub-optimal way of trading and puts you at a disadvantage.
Professional traders do not trade based on any kind of 1-2 bar candlestick patterns, why should you?
There is a reason professional traders make money, whilst the majority of retail traders don’t.
It can also easily be said that when retail traders are getting in the market, professional traders are already in profit.
Let’s look at an example using a chart to illustrate this.
Below is a 1 hour chart of the AUD/USD in which we can see a short-term resistance level that rejected price followed by a breakout and false break. Price then came back to re-test the level again and formed an engulfing bar.
Now, there are two ways to trade these engulfing bars according to the majority of candlestick teachers/sites.
- a) Enter at the break of the low of the engulfing bar, or…
- b) enter on a 50% retracement into the bar.
Let’s assume we trade this engulfing bar the way it’s taught by most and compare both types of entries to a professional way of trading the same level. We will use the same stop loss- and target location in all three examples.
First out, the trade entering on a break of the low of the engulfing bar. The stop loss is placed at a healthy distance above the resistance level.
As you can see from the screenshot, this trade would have a stop loss of 17 pips and a target of 25 pips resulting in a potential +1.47R
Now, this is how a possible 50% retrace entry would have played out not changing anything but the entry location.
In this example price never retraced back into the bar and continued to sell off. Using this approach, we would have missed out completely on this trade opportunity.
For the sake of this comparison, let’s assume price did pull back to the 50% mark into the engulfing bar. We then would have had a stop loss of 11 pips and a target of 31 pips resulting in a risk/reward ratio of 2,81R.
Not bad, almost a 100% improvement in risk vs. reward.
Let’s compare this to taking the trade directly off the resistance level, again, leaving the stop loss and target untouched.
This is where it gets interesting. This trade would have had a stop loss of only 7 pips and a target of 35 pips, resulting in a risk/reward of 5R(!).
This fact alone should make you raise your eyebrows and realize that using engulfing bars as a way to enter gives you a sub-optimal entry at best.
Now, most engulfing bar traders would argue that using engulfing bars as “confirmation” of a level increases their win rate (which isn’t true!). But, for the sake of the argument let’s play with the thought that it is and give the engulfing bars a +20% higher win rate.
To be able to compare the 3 different examples above in detail, let’s put the numbers against each other over a 100-trade sample size.
Example 1 – Entry at break of engulfing bar:
Stop loss: 0.76000 (17 pips)
Target: 0.75580 (25 pips)
# of trades: 100
Win rate: 60%
Losing trade: -1R
Winning trade: +1,47R
Calculation: 60 x 1,47 + (40 x -1,00) = 48,2
End Result: +48.2R return over 100 trades
Example 2 – Entry at 50% retracement into EB:
Stop loss: 0.76000 (11 pips)
Target: 0.75580 (31 pips)
# of trades: 100
Win rate: 60%
Losing trade: -1R
Winning trade: +2,81R
Calculation: 60 x 2,81 + (40 x -1,00) = 128,6
End Result: +128.6R return over 100 trades
Example 3 – Entry at S/R level:
Stop loss: 0.76000 (7 pips)
Target: 0.75580 (35 pips)
# of trades: 100
Win rate: 40%
Losing trade: -1R
Winning trade: +5R
Calculation: 40 x 5 + (60 x -1,00) = 140
End Result: +140R return over 100 trades
Entry at break of engulfing bar (win rate 60%): +48,2R
Entry at 50% retracement into engulfing bar (win rate 60%): +128,6R
Entry from S/R level (win rate 40%): +140R
These numbers should put this discussion to bed once and for all. Why?
Engulfing bars won’t increase your win rate by 20%. Even if they did, the best entry option of the two engulfing bar examples would still produce less profit compared with our entry at the level.
On top of this there are even more things to consider…
- You will not always be presented with an engulfing bar at your chosen support and resistance levels which further works against you.
- It will render you passive when perfectly good trade opportunities present themselves.
- You’ll sit there waiting for a pattern to emerge only to see the move play out in front of your eyes (a move which professional traders are profiting from).
Using the engulfing bar “confirmation” to enter trades is a sub-optimal way of trading, working heavily against your overall trading performance by:
- Decreasing your trading opportunities drastically and reducing the number of times you can apply your edge in the market.
- Giving you a worse entry.
- Increasing the size of your SL.
- Decreasing the size of your target.
Engulfing bar traders only have one argument to counter the above. They claim that trading using engulfing bars increases their win rate and thus makes up for the drawbacks mentioned above. Even if that was true (which it is not), the so called “blind entry” still performs better as shown in our calculations above.
By looking at this objectively and comparing the numbers we can see that trading using engulfing bars is a sub-optimal way of trading. The only reason it is so widely spread throughout the retail market is because it makes trading easy, plus the “confirmation” part caters to the lack of trust beginning traders have in the markets and their own trading.
So, the differences between a professional trader’s entry and a retail entry should be very clear by now. Especially with all the other content we’ve posted before.
If you want to continue to have sub-optimal retail entries, then you can use the forex engulfing candle as tool to trade the markets.
If you on the other hand want an entry location that gives you a lot more trading opportunities along with a better overall performance, then you’ll want to adjust your trading method.
This is what we teach in our price action course. Now, if you found this article useful, please make sure to like, share and tweet it below, and we’d love to hear from you what “a-ha” moments you have from this article.
So, please come over to see more content like this on our website at 2ndskiesforex.com where all the discussion is happening and leave your comments there.
But thank you for reading this forex engulfing candle article from 2ndSkiesForex.com, where we teach you how to increase the way you trade, think and perform.”
Now that you’ve read the article and had a chance to analyze the two methods and how they perform differently, which one wins?
What do you think?
Please share and comment below.